Lawyers for the most senior Roman Catholic found guilty of child sex abuse have argued in his appeal that he could not have molested two choirboys in an Australian cathedral undetected moments after Sunday mass while he was dressed in an archbishopâs robes.
Cardinal George Pell, 77, wore a black suit and black shirt with a clericâs collar when he appeared for the Victoria state Court of Appeal hearing before three judges.
He came and went from the court as the sole occupant of a prison van, and said nothing during the hearing.
Pellâs lawyer Bret Walker argued for more than five hours that the five verdicts against Pell were âunsafe and unsatisfactoryâ and should be overturned.
The prosecution will argue on Thursday why the verdicts were sound and should stand. Whoever wins, the case could reach the High Court, Australiaâs ultimate arbiter.
A jury unanimously convicted Pell in December of orally raping a 13-year-old choirboy and indecently dealing with the boy and his 13-year-old friend in Melbourneâs St Patrickâs Cathedral in the late 1990s. Pell had become archbishop of Melbourne only months before.
Court orders had for months prevented publication of the details of that trial and an earlier trial on similar charges that had ended in September with a deadlocked jury.
Pell was sentenced in March to six years in prison, and is held in special protective custody.
Francisâs papacy has been thrown into turmoil by clerical sexual abuse and the churchâs handling of such cases worldwide.
In a little more than a year, the Pope has admitted he made âgrave errorsâ in Chileâs worst case of cover-up, Pell was convicted of abuse, a French cardinal was convicted of failing to report a paedophile, and a third cardinal, former US church leader Theodore McCarrick, was defrocked after a Vatican investigation determined he abused children and adults.
Mr Walker told the three judges the main ground for appeal was that the jury could not have found Pell guilty beyond reasonable doubt on the evidence.
In written submissions, Pellâs lawyers said more than 20 prosecution witnesses who had an official role in the Sunday mass in 1996 gave evidence that the offences did not or could not have occurred.
âThis evidence constituted a catalogue of at least 13 solid obstacles in the path of a conviction,â the lawyers said.
âNo matter what view was taken of the complainant as a witness, it was simply not open to a jury to accept his words beyond reasonable doubt,â they added.
Pellâs lawyers argue in their submissions that the âthe evidence showed the offending was impossibleâ.
âIâm a victim. I hope they put a rope around his … neck,â a tearful Mr Mitchell said. âThey say âhow could you remember back 70 years?â I remember everything.â