Conor Benn refuses to comment on claims he has been ‘provisionally suspended’

- Advertisement -

Conor Benn has refused to comment on claims he has been “provisionally suspended” by UK Anti-Doping.

The 26-year-old welterweight took to social media on Tuesday to accuse someone at either the British Boxing Board of Control or UKAD of leaking an apparent development in his case, but insisting he is still “free to fight outside the UK”.

However, he neither confirmed nor denied the suggestion of a ban reportedly imposed on March 15.

Writing on his Twitter account, Benn said: “I can’t comment on anything to do with UKAD other than to say that I am in touch with them.

“Someone at the BBBoC or UKAD obviously wanted to create a headline, unlike the [Amir] Khan case where it was kept quiet for 14 months, but this is nothing new.

“I remain free to fight outside the UK.”

The PA news agency has contacted both the BBBoC and UKAD for comment.

Conor Benn (right) was due to fight Chris Eubank Jr (left) in October last year
Conor Benn (right) was due to fight Chris Eubank Jr (left) in October last year (Steven Paston/PA)

Trace amounts of fertility drug clomiphene, known to elevate testosterone levels in men, were detected in Benn’s urine, but the World Boxing Council cleared the welterweight fighter of intentional doping in February.

A “highly elevated consumption of eggs” was considered a “reasonable explanation” and while investigations by UKAD and the BBBoC are ongoing, Benn is free to resume his boxing career outside of the UK after relinquishing his BBBoC licence.

Former light-welterweight world champion Khan was handed a two-year ban from all sport earlier this month after testing positive for a prohibited substance.

Amir Khan was handed a two-year ban from all sport earlier this month after testing positive for a prohibited substance
Amir Khan was handed a two-year ban from all sport earlier this month after testing positive for a prohibited substance (Nick Potts/PA)

Khan, who announced his retirement in May last year, accepted a violation of anti-doping rules, but said he had not intentionally ingested the substance, an argument accepted by an independent panel following a hearing in January.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest Stories

- Advertisement -

UK News

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Read the latest free supplements

Read the Town Crier, Le Rocher and a whole host of other subjects like mortgage advice, business, cycling, travel and property.